Source

Standing: How later courts treated this decision has not been analysed. None of the 2 citing decisions has been analysed.

75 I 16

5, Arrêt du 24 février 1949 dans la cause Berthoud contre Genève, Tribunal de première instance et Union de banques SUÏÍSSES.

Renonciation à la garantie conatitutionnelle du for du domicile sart. 59 Cst.).

Convention de prorogation de for résgultani, in casu, d’une élection de domicile à Genève doni sont convenues, dans cette ville, deux parties représgentées par des avocats genevois, à la veille d’un procès dont elles savaient qu’il ressortissait à la juridiction d’un autre canton. Election de domicile et choix d’une adresse de notification.

Verzicht auf die Garantie des W ohnsitzgerichtsstandes (Art. 59 BV ). Gerichtesstand der Prorogation, in casu begründet durch « Domizilerwählung » in Genf seitens zweier durch Genfer Anwälte vertretene Parteien in Hinblick auf enen bevorstehenden Prozess

Provisions amended since

This decision construes provisions whose act has since been consolidated again. Whether the article itself changed is not recorded.

  • Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation, Art. 59 — the act was consolidated again on January 1, 2000, June 10, 2001, December 2, 2001, March 3, 2002, April 1, 2003, August 1, 2003, February 8, 2004, March 2, 2005, November 27, 2005, May 21, 2006, January 1, 2007, January 1, 2008, November 30, 2008, May 17, 2009, September 27, 2009, November 29, 2009, March 7, 2010, November 28, 2010, January 1, 2011, March 11, 2012, September 23, 2012, March 3, 2013, February 9, 2014, May 18, 2014, June 14, 2015, January 1, 2016, February 12, 2017, September 24, 2017, January 1, 2018, September 23, 2018, January 1, 2020, January 1, 2021, March 7, 2021, November 28, 2021, February 13, 2022, January 1, 2024, and March 3, 2024.

Cited in