21:I[146728,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0y06zk4vhy942.js","/_next/static/chunks/0ytf__cyr8--m.js"],"default"] 22:I[498718,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0y06zk4vhy942.js","/_next/static/chunks/0ytf__cyr8--m.js"],"default"] 23:I[98564,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0y06zk4vhy942.js","/_next/static/chunks/0ytf__cyr8--m.js"],"default"] 25:I[447961,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0y06zk4vhy942.js","/_next/static/chunks/0ytf__cyr8--m.js"],"default"] 26:I[961786,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0y06zk4vhy942.js","/_next/static/chunks/0ytf__cyr8--m.js"],"default"] 28:I[603421,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0y06zk4vhy942.js","/_next/static/chunks/0ytf__cyr8--m.js"],"default"] 27:T41c,

Faits

aperçu avant l'impression

N° affaire:

BO.1999.0110

Autorité:, Date décision:

TA, 29.03.2000

Juge:

Considérants

Greffier:

Publication (revue juridique):

Ref. TF:

Nom des parties contenant:

c/OCBEA

aLAEF-6-1-3

aRLAEF-3

Résumé contenant:

L'échec au concours d'entrée de l'ECAL n'est pas une raison valable au sens de la LAE pour fréquenter l'ESAV, à Genève. RR.