21:I[146728,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 22:I[498718,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 23:I[98564,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 25:I[447961,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 26:I[961786,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 28:I[603421,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 27:T44b,

Faits

aperçu avant l'impression

N° affaire:

CR.1992.0309

Autorité:, Date décision:

TA, 02.11.1992

Juge:

Considérants

Greffier:

Publication (revue juridique):

Ref. TF:

Nom des parties contenant:

c/ SA

EXCÈS DE VITESSE

LCR-16-3-a

Résumé contenant:

Rpc 2 mois confirmé (94/50) dans zone urbaine; pas d'antécédent (rappel de la jurisprudence selon laquelle les rpc obligatoires entraînent une mesure plus sévère).