21:I[146728,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 22:I[498718,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 23:I[98564,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 25:I[447961,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 26:I[961786,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 28:I[603421,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 27:T449,

Faits

aperçu avant l'impression

N° affaire:

CR.1995.0326

Autorité:, Date décision:

TA, 07.12.1995

Juge:

Considérants

Greffier:

Publication (revue juridique):

Ref. TF:

Nom des parties contenant:

c/ SA

EXCÈS DE VITESSE

LCR-16-3-a

Résumé contenant:

RPC 1 mois confirmé (94/60 km/h.) Le fait que la limitation de vitesse vienne de passer de 80 à 60 km/h en raison de la période estivale est sans pertinence. Rejet.