21:I[146728,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0_4kls4xe18~v.js","/_next/static/chunks/0dfs3ldbi-07_.js"],"default"] 22:I[498718,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0_4kls4xe18~v.js","/_next/static/chunks/0dfs3ldbi-07_.js"],"default"] 23:I[98564,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0_4kls4xe18~v.js","/_next/static/chunks/0dfs3ldbi-07_.js"],"default"] 25:I[447961,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0_4kls4xe18~v.js","/_next/static/chunks/0dfs3ldbi-07_.js"],"default"] 26:I[961786,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0_4kls4xe18~v.js","/_next/static/chunks/0dfs3ldbi-07_.js"],"default"] 28:I[603421,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0_4kls4xe18~v.js","/_next/static/chunks/0dfs3ldbi-07_.js"],"default"] 27:T417,

Faits

aperçu avant l'impression

N° affaire:

PE.1998.0254

Autorité:, Date décision:

TA, 11.11.1998

Juge:

Considérants

Greffier:

Publication (revue juridique):

Ref. TF:

Nom des parties contenant:

A-OFE-643

Résumé contenant:

L'examen des éléments à prendre en compte selon la directive A-OFE-643 ne permet pas le renouvellement de l'autorisation de séjour nonobstant le divorce. Recours rejeté.