21:I[146728,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 22:I[498718,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 23:I[98564,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 25:I[447961,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 26:I[961786,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 28:I[603421,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/083db9hgz.io..js","/_next/static/chunks/0pr1-~5o2o.3-.js"],"default"] 27:T414,

Faits

aperçu avant l'impression

N° affaire:

PE.1998.0422

Autorité:, Date décision:

TA, 29.06.1999

Juge:

Considérants

Greffier:

Publication (revue juridique):

Ref. TF:

Nom des parties contenant:

c/OCE

aLAsi-28

LSEE-10-1

Résumé contenant:

Recours partiellement admis en ce qu'il concerne l'époux est rejeté pour le surplus. L'intéressée a en effet démontré qu'elle cherchait autrement un emploi.