20:I[146728,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/06uw9h18k8-1-.js","/_next/static/chunks/03d~2dohtb5j4.js"],"default"] 21:I[498718,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/06uw9h18k8-1-.js","/_next/static/chunks/03d~2dohtb5j4.js"],"default"] 22:I[98564,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/06uw9h18k8-1-.js","/_next/static/chunks/03d~2dohtb5j4.js"],"default"] 24:I[447961,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/06uw9h18k8-1-.js","/_next/static/chunks/03d~2dohtb5j4.js"],"default"] 25:I[961786,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/06uw9h18k8-1-.js","/_next/static/chunks/03d~2dohtb5j4.js"],"default"] 27:I[603421,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/06uw9h18k8-1-.js","/_next/static/chunks/03d~2dohtb5j4.js"],"default"] 29:I[27201,["/_next/static/chunks/0x.73w57rn4ou.js","/_next/static/chunks/0i.l9589uvx0j.js"],"IconMark"] 26:T42f,

Faits

aperçu avant l'impression

N° affaire:

PE.2000.0430

Autorité:, Date décision:

TA, 27.12.2000

Juge:

Considérants

Greffier:

JCW

Publication (revue juridique):

Ref. TF:

Nom des parties contenant:

c/OCMP

OLE-7

OLE-8

Résumé contenant:

Refus d'autorisation de travail fondé sur l'absence d'intérêt économique de la demande. Pouvoir d'examen du TA limité sur ce point à l'arbitraire. RR.