20:I[146728,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/06uw9h18k8-1-.js","/_next/static/chunks/03d~2dohtb5j4.js"],"default"] 21:I[498718,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/06uw9h18k8-1-.js","/_next/static/chunks/03d~2dohtb5j4.js"],"default"] 22:I[98564,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/06uw9h18k8-1-.js","/_next/static/chunks/03d~2dohtb5j4.js"],"default"] 24:I[447961,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/06uw9h18k8-1-.js","/_next/static/chunks/03d~2dohtb5j4.js"],"default"] 25:I[961786,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/06uw9h18k8-1-.js","/_next/static/chunks/03d~2dohtb5j4.js"],"default"] 27:I[603421,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/06uw9h18k8-1-.js","/_next/static/chunks/03d~2dohtb5j4.js"],"default"] 26:T426,

Faits

aperçu avant l'impression

N° affaire:

PE.2000.0628

Autorité:, Date décision:

TA, 14.06.2001

Juge:

Considérants

Greffier:

JCW

Publication (revue juridique):

Ref. TF:

Nom des parties contenant:

c/OCMP

OFE-414-1

OLE-8-3-a

Résumé contenant:

Ressortissante chinoise bien formée, la recourante serait a priori qualifiée; mais aucun motif particulier ne justifie une exception. RR.