20:I[146728,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0azh54munae2i.js","/_next/static/chunks/0.xcm_mw~_xnr.js"],"default"] 21:I[498718,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0azh54munae2i.js","/_next/static/chunks/0.xcm_mw~_xnr.js"],"default"] 22:I[98564,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0azh54munae2i.js","/_next/static/chunks/0.xcm_mw~_xnr.js"],"default"] 24:I[447961,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0azh54munae2i.js","/_next/static/chunks/0.xcm_mw~_xnr.js"],"default"] 25:I[961786,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0azh54munae2i.js","/_next/static/chunks/0.xcm_mw~_xnr.js"],"default"] 27:I[603421,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0azh54munae2i.js","/_next/static/chunks/0.xcm_mw~_xnr.js"],"default"] 29:I[27201,["/_next/static/chunks/0x.73w57rn4ou.js","/_next/static/chunks/0i.l9589uvx0j.js"],"IconMark"] 26:T41b,

Faits

aperçu avant l'impression

N° affaire:

PS.1992.0237

Autorité:, Date décision:

TA, 24.11.1992

Juge:

Considérants

Greffier:

Publication (revue juridique):

Ref. TF:

Nom des parties contenant:

c/ OCAC

CAFETIER-RESTAURATEUR

LACI-59

Résumé contenant:

Recours admis pour la fréquentation du cours donné par la Sté VD des cafetiers restaurateurs et hôteliers en vue de la patente d'établissement courant.