21:I[146728,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0azh54munae2i.js","/_next/static/chunks/0.xcm_mw~_xnr.js"],"default"] 22:I[498718,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0azh54munae2i.js","/_next/static/chunks/0.xcm_mw~_xnr.js"],"default"] 23:I[98564,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0azh54munae2i.js","/_next/static/chunks/0.xcm_mw~_xnr.js"],"default"] 25:I[447961,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0azh54munae2i.js","/_next/static/chunks/0.xcm_mw~_xnr.js"],"default"] 26:I[961786,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0azh54munae2i.js","/_next/static/chunks/0.xcm_mw~_xnr.js"],"default"] 28:I[603421,["/_next/static/chunks/116_os_qb8zky.js","/_next/static/chunks/050hmfmbb_yl9.js","/_next/static/chunks/0pjboplmb~k09.js","/_next/static/chunks/0azh54munae2i.js","/_next/static/chunks/0.xcm_mw~_xnr.js"],"default"] 27:T417,

Faits

aperçu avant l'impression

N° affaire:

PS.1995.0293

Autorité:, Date décision:

TA, 06.12.1995

Juge:

Considérants

Greffier:

Publication (revue juridique):

Ref. TF:

Nom des parties contenant:

c/ OCAC

LACI-30-1-d

Résumé contenant:

Un manoeuvre du bâtiment ne peut pas refuser un emploi sûr dans son domaine d'activité au motif qu'il attend la réponse d'un employeur pour un poste de camionneur.